Charter Pulse

Selected readings on US charter schools

Charter Schools: The Freedom to Teach

teachingPublic school teachers have a very challenging profession. Keeping young learners in their classrooms so engaged that they want to learn takes patience, and enormous skill. But that is only a small part of what teachers can contribute to school success.

What if teachers could use their expertise and be held accountable for decisions regarding budgeting, staffing, curriculum, and team building? What if teachers were allowed to be the professionals they are?

When I was a Minnesota state senator in 1987, I had dinner with a friend who had left her job teaching science in an urban school district. She moved to the corporate office of a local healthcare entity. Had the money made her quit? “No,” she replied. “It was the freedom.”

My friend had grown frustrated with school administrators as she sought to implement her creative ideas in curriculum and teaching methods. “My ideas were not valued,” she told me. “I was not respected as an educator. I lost my passion.”

Creating Education Freedom

This was a pivotal conversation for me as I worked over the next five years to author the first chartered school law in 1991 in Minnesota. As a union-endorsed Democrat, I wanted to empower teachers and parents to create independent public schools and try new, innovative learning strategies, without the confines of a K-12 system unable to change.

Chartering was never intended for all teachers. But it was, and remains, a valuable option for some. Today charter school teachers are guiding over 2.3 million students in over 6,000 chartered schools in 42 states and DC. And over one million names are on waiting lists to enroll in their classrooms.

Many teachers are surprised to learn that Albert Shanker, president of the American Federation of Teachers, was one of the first to propose a “charter school” in 1988. He wanted to create a professional role for teachers. He envisioned the new schools as led by teachers within school districts. Later that year, he told Minnesotans, “This is a system that can take its customers for granted.”

Yet teacher unions were (and still are) skeptical of chartering schools, which typically operate outside district control. They vigorously opposed Minnesota’s charter law and those of many other states.

I’m grateful that now, after 20 years, some teachers and union leaders see new opportunities in chartering, coming full circle to Shanker’s vision. In 2011, Minnesota approved the first union-initiated charter school authorizer in the nation. The same union leaders who opposed chartering 20 years ago now sit on the authorizing board of the Minnesota Guild of Public Charter Schools.

Catalyst for Reforms

Chartering has also been a catalyst for other reforms in teacher autonomy. In 1994, a “Teacher Professional Partnership” was formed and owned by teachers. It enters into contracts with chartered school boards in Minnesota, accepting school success in exchange for teacher authority within the school.

That being said, other charter schools explicitly lay out areas of teacher autonomy (ie staffing, budgeting, curriculum) in contracts between authorizers and the school. Still others don’t offer teacher autonomy at all. But the possibility for innovation is always there.

This design change is showing results. Eleven successful examples of teacher autonomy in public schools, charter and district, are illustrated in Trusting Teachers with School Success, by Kim Farris-Berg and Edward Dirkswager. The authors conclude that autonomous teachers emulate the nine cultural characteristics of high-performing organizations. They continue: “[I]f we want high-performing schools, then the fundamentally different incentive structure of teacher autonomy is the design change we need. It’s time to trust teachers with professional authority in return for their acceptance of accountability for school success.”

Chartering is one pathway that allows this “freedom to be better” for entrepreneurial teachers. I encourage teachers across the nation to take a second look at chartering, not through the filter of past controversies, but through the opportunity of gaining autonomy in return for accountability. For many teachers, there may be nothing more rewarding than having the freedom to help learners by doing what they do best.

Source: Heartlander Magazine – Former Minnesota State Senator Ember Reichgott Junge (ember@visi.com) is author of the first charter school law in the nation and author of Zero Chance of Passage: The Pioneering Charter School Story.

Advertisements

Share your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on October 28, 2013 by in Charter Schools, NATIONWIDE and tagged , .

Disclaimer

All copyrights of the content shared (articles, images, videos etc.) on this site belong to their respective owners. Articles and reader comments shared are not necessarily endorsed. Images and links used may differ from those in original sources.

Daily Archive

October 2013
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

%d bloggers like this: