Charter Pulse

Selected readings on US charter schools

WASHINGTON: Charter school proposals could pave way for education ideas

washingtonWashington state, ahead of the national curve in so many areas of public policy, is a notable laggard on the issue of charter schools. Washington finally joined 41 other states and the District of Columbia in authorizing the schools last November, when voters narrowly approved Initiative 1240.

And a narrow victory it was. Voters statewide gave it a 50.69 percent yes vote, a victory margin of just over 40,000 votes out of more than 3 million cast. Yakima County’s approval percentage was only slightly better: 51.53 percent yes, or by about 2,300 votes out of approximately 75,000 cast. The vote was fairly evenly split in each of the state’s 39 counties, defying the east-west, rural-urban divide that defines most elections in Washington. The victory came after four defeats, the first in 1996.

A charter school is a public school that is open to all students but operates independently of district management and administrative rules. Initiative 1240 is a targeted approach, more of a pilot program, with tight guidelines and accountability measures. It allows for a maximum of eight schools a year to a total of 40 in the next five years — out of a statewide total of more than 2,300 public schools.

Nonprofit organizations or school district boards could set them up; there will be no religious charter schools. A new state agency, the Charter School Commission, is now accepting applications, and it stands to get at least two from the Yakima Valley.

One, from a group called Charter Schools of Sunnyside, last month held an informational meeting that attracted about 50 people, including 15th District state Rep. Bruce Chandler. A second group, the Yakima-based Cesar Chavez Charter School Foundation, would gear its dual-language curriculum toward Latino and migrant students. In addition, the West Valley School District is considering authorizing a charter school; under the initiative, school boards can convert a current school to a charter school or set up a new school, and the schools would receive an allocation of state funding based on their student enrollments.

Different approaches drive the two nonprofit proposals. The impetus for the Sunnyside group comes from a parent whose concern about the quality of local schools has prompted her to home-school her children. The Yakima school reflects a sense that public schools are not adequately educating students for whom English is a second language.

None of these is a done deal. The groups first must submit a letter of intent later this month, then submit an application to the Charter School Commission by Nov. 22. The West Valley district is merely discussing the idea; it hasn’t yet decided whether to follow through with an application. And with only eight schools per year authorized, competition is likely to be strong.

Local charter school advocates reflect grassroots concerns about whether local schools are addressing differing needs of particular students. As such, they could prove useful as laboratories for what works and what doesn’t. If they don’t work, there is a safeguard; the charter agreement between the operators and commission must be renewed every five years.

As of 2011, about 5,600 charter schools were operating nationwide; some are functioning well, and others are doing poorly. But this state’s tightly drawn law recognizes abuses in other states; one key to success will be the quality of oversight by the Charter School Commission, which benefits from having a low number of schools to police.

Charter schools aren’t a cure, but they are a tool. The key is assuring that the tool is well utilized.

Source: Yakima Herald Republic – Editorial

View more articles on Washington charter schools

Advertisements

One comment on “WASHINGTON: Charter school proposals could pave way for education ideas

  1. Puget Sound Parent
    October 9, 2013

    No mention of the fact that the ONLY reason this garbage, anti-public education legislation known as 1240 passed was due to a handful of billionaires funding it, and outspending the opposition by a mere 17 to 1. Seventeen To One!!!

    You could pass a law mandating colder weather to Alaska residents with a 17 to 1 edge in resources.

    Even then, the best you could manage was a statistical tie.

    And, if people knew what was REALLY in 1240, as opposed to what the “Happy Faced” commercials were showing, one year ago, it would have lost in an absolute landslide.

    You won’t get past the lawsuit anyway. 1240 is unconstitutional and deceptive. No court will let it stand. And, if even one small part of it is allowed to exist, we will see that it gets defunded and that anyone favoring it gets called out for being the right wingers they surely are.

    You’re NOT going to do to Washington’s schools what you did to them in so many other states.

    Just watch.

Share your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on October 4, 2013 by in Charter Schools, Washington.

Disclaimer

All copyrights of the content shared (articles, images, videos etc.) on this site belong to their respective owners. Articles and reader comments shared are not necessarily endorsed. Images and links used may differ from those in original sources.

Daily Archive

October 2013
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

%d bloggers like this: