Charter Pulse

Selected readings on US charter schools

Diane Ravitch’s Charter Narrative Is Incomplete


John Spink, AJC

The education historian Diane Ravitch is barnstorming the country promoting her new book Reign of Error. Ravitch is a fantastic story teller who selectively uses data and anecdotes to make a sweeping indictment of education reform in America. There is certainly some harsh truth in what she writes (e.g. education consultants have made a financial killing on education reform efforts in recent years with Race to the Top being a prime example).

But, her sweeping generalizations don’t hold up when it comes to charter schools. Ravitch argues that “what’s wrong with charter schools is that they originally were supposed to be created to collaborate with public schools and help them solve problems.” But, she claims, “they have now been taken over by the idea of competition, they have become part of the movement to turn education into a consumer product rather than a social and public responsibility.”

In working with charter schools in Ohio, and now Idaho, I have met dozens of educators over the years who started their careers as teachers in district schools or as administrators in district offices. These educators turned to the charter school model only after coming to the realization that if they wanted to better serve their kids they needed the freedom and flexibility that comes with a charter school. They simply couldn’t do what their students needed because their hands were tied by rule-bound school districts or special interests that were more concerned with protecting turf, money and influence than shaking things up. These charter reformers, in fact, are exactly the sorts of educators that early charter advocates like the legendary American Federation of Teachers president Al Shanker, Minnesota’s charter school patron Joe Nathan, and Diane Ravitch herself wanted opening and running schools when the charter idea was being debated in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

There are many in the charter school community that have tried to make change happen in collaboration with their districts or as part of a larger district reform effort. For example, in Dayton Ohio, the charter school concept was embraced way back in 1997 by then district superintendent James Williams. Williams proposed conversion of the district’s five most troubled schools into charters as a way to try and turn them around. His charter plan was supported by a significant cross section of the Dayton community, including the presidents of the University of Dayton, the major local utility company, Key Bank’s Dayton district, and Sinclair Community College, as well as the provost of Wright State University.

Despite the community buy-in the plan was ultimately scuttled by teacher union opposition. Williams told me during an interview for a book I was co-authoring on Ohio’s school reform efforts in 2008 that “at the end of the day, the union vetoed it. It was the biggest disappointment in my career.” The demise of the Williams’ plan led to an explosion of charter growth in Dayton that over 15-years provided mixed results academically, and that for much of the time made discussion of education and education reform toxic in a city that badly needed better schools for its students.

This is history Ravitch knows because for much of this time she was on the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation board, and was receiving updates three times a year from me and my Fordham colleagues on happenings in Dayton. But, such history was not unique to Ohio. In Idaho, where I am now working as president of the Idaho Charter School Network, I am meeting charter school leaders across the Gem State. They too share painful stories of trying to work within their traditional school districts to create new programs and opportunities for students. They too have faced rejection and frustration. Rather than give up, however, these educators decided to use their state charter law to open schools of their own. A growing portion of these schools are now Idaho’s top performing public schools.

The North Idaho STEM Academy is a great example. This highly rated school was started by a husband and wife team. She is a nationally board certified teacher and he a long-time school administrator. The school is winning acclaim across Idaho and the nation. During my recent visit I not only saw children engaged in state of the art science projects but met a retired NASA astronaut who worked with the students as a volunteer. The school operates in a collection of portable classrooms (literally in the shadow of the district high school), but despite the facility challenges the school has a long wait list.

North Idaho STEM Academy, like many other charters across the country, have allowed frustrated educators the opportunity to provide a choice that local districts couldn’t or wouldn’t. These schools do not fit into Ravitch’s narrative of “a corporate takeover” of American education or a “Reign of Error,” but they are an important piece of the American experience with charters and should be part of any honest telling of that history.

Source: Ohio Gadfly – by Terry Ryan (President of the Idaho Charter School Network)


One comment on “Diane Ravitch’s Charter Narrative Is Incomplete

  1. Joe Bleaux
    October 2, 2013

    I find it quite puzzling that Mr. Ryan bases his response to “Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools” on three sentences that do not appear in the book. (The sentences are from an interview Dr. Ravitch gave to NPR on September 27.) Even more puzzling is Mr. Ryan’s failure to address the underlying point of those three sentences–namely, that the promise of charter schools and their original LEGISLATIVE intent has been systematically undermined, perverted, or ignored by so-called education reformers who seek “to turn education into a consumer product rather than a social and public responsibility.”

    That idea of transforming public schools into a consumer product is, in fact, the central idea of the entire book, one that Dr. Ravitch applies to the public-school system as a whole and not only to charter schools.

    Rather than address Dr. Ravitch’s contention that the promise of charter schools has been hijacked by those seeking to profit from privatization, or address the concept of privatization itself, Mr. Ryan instead takes the obligatory swipe at unions, blaming their intransigence for the failure of charter schools to transform public education, to multiply as quickly as he might wish, or, at the very least, to claw from state legislatures an amount of loot equal to that provided to traditional public schools.

    By the time Mr. Ryan’s piece gets around to singing the praises of a single, isolated Idaho charter school, he appears to have forgotten Dr. Ravitch altogether, much less her claims about the danger to public education and democracy posed by the privatization of public schools. Perhaps he can address those claims in another piece, one that focuses on such Idaho charter schools as the Idaho Virtual Academy (operated by the for-profit education behemoth K12, Inc.) or INSPIRE Connections Academy (a product of Pearson, the “world’s leading learning company”).

    Meanwhile, I encourage Mr. Ryan to look to Dr. Ravitch’s book for a broader and more accurate understanding of her view of charter schools. I believe he will find that her beef is not with charter schools themselves, but with the fact that, as she said on NPR, “when people pay taxes for schools, they don’t think they are paying off investors. They think they’re paying for small class sizes and better teachers.”

    Interview with Diane Ravitch on NPR, September 27, 2013

Share your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on September 30, 2013 by in Advocacy, Charter Schools, Idaho, NATIONWIDE, Ohio.


All copyrights of the content shared (articles, images, videos etc.) on this site belong to their respective owners. Articles and reader comments shared are not necessarily endorsed. Images and links used may differ from those in original sources.

Daily Archive

September 2013
« Aug   Oct »

%d bloggers like this: